Core thesis: U.S. equity markets follow predictable seasonal patterns tied to the 4-year presidential election cycle. Years 1–2 are historically weak; Years 3–4 are stronger. Within each year, specific quarters carry statistically significant win-rates — enabling disciplined over/under-weighting.
Allocation engine — 3 modes: Mode A (cash/deposit, ~0.9%/quarter) in low-probability quarters. Mode B (1× via VOO) in moderate quarters. Mode C (2× leveraged via SPUU) only in highest-confidence quarters (win-rates 72–94% for S&P; up to 100% for NDX Y1Q2). The allocation map differs slightly between S&P and Nasdaq-100, reflecting their distinct seasonal patterns.
S&P 500 backtested (1953–2024, 18 cycles): Avg 4-year cycle return 97% vs 38% buy-and-hold. Strategy beats S&P in 15 of 18 cycles. Only 1 negative cycle (2005–2008, −37%). Win rate: 84% of quarters vs 68% for buy-and-hold.
Nasdaq-100 backtested (1986–2024, 9 cycles): Avg 4-year cycle return ~241% vs ~91% buy-and-hold. Key difference: NDX Year 1 uses 2× leverage in Q2/Q3/Q4 (vs S&P which uses deposit in Q3); NDX Year 4 goes to deposit in Q3/Q4 (vs S&P which stays 1× through Y4Q3). NDX strategy underperformed in 2017–2020 cycle (−41pp) due to 2018 drawdown with 2× leverage, and missed 2020 rally (deposit in Y4Q3/Q4).
2025–2028 tailwinds: (1) Trump not running in 2028 → historically strengthens Year 3 (2027). (2) Unified government (Republican sweep) → academic research links to higher excess equity returns. (3) No recession in 2025 → very low recession risk for 2026–2027.
Implementation: UBS AG Actively Managed Certificate (AMC). Trading costs ~5 bps/trade, Swiss stamp duty savings 15 bps. Monthly rebalancing. Leveraged instruments only when seasonality ≥80%.
| Cycle | Yr1 | Yr2 | Yr3 | Yr4 | S&P Cycle | Strategy | Delta |
|---|
| Year | S&P 500 | Strategy | Ratio |
|---|
| Factor | Condition | Impact on Current Cycle |
|---|